Search the directory
Much of modern day science would not be possible without the use of computers, and as a result, many scientists spend a significant part of their time writing code. During the past 5 years or so since the Netherlands eScience Center first started working with scientists, some patterns related to research software have emerged.
For example, research software often contains components that are quite generic in their application. To give you some idea, this may include components to connect to remote systems, to couple dynamic models or to parallelize computations. In the 100+ projects we have done so far, we see many implementations of what is functionally the same thing. What's more, the code quality often leaves something to be desired. For example, there are typically no tests, documentation is often lacking, and the code does not usually adhere to any coding standards. This isn't to say that the scientists who wrote such code did a bad job, but rather it is the natural result of what scientists are judged on, namely the scientific quality of the papers they put out, as opposed to the quality of software that enables such papers.
So, one of the goals that the Netherlands eScience Center has set itself, is to identify such components, generalize them, and increase their software engineering quality to the point where they can be re-used by scientists from a broad variety of backgrounds. This way, scientists can spend what limited time they have on developing and testing their scientific ideas, as opposed to struggling with coding problems that have nothing to do with their scientific challenges.
For a while, we thought (naively perhaps) that as long as we would do a good job of improving the software engineering, surely we would see our tools being integrated into newly developed scientific software. So far though, adoption of our tools has mostly been limited to people that we are already involved with, for example because we do a project with them, or because they have consulted us on how their software can better address the scientific challenges they are facing, or because they have attended one of our symposia. While this is a good start, we also want to help scientists with whom we are not directly involved. To do so, we want to make sure that our software can be found online.
Scientists, like most people these days, depend on search engines whenever they are looking for information on something. However, search engines are not very good when it comes to helping people find software. Problems exist both on the 'asking' side and on the 'answering' side of a query for software. On the asking side, using the correct terminology is difficult for scientists unfamiliar with computer science vocabulary. On the answering side, the software you are looking for might not be listed in the search results even if it exists on a software repository website such as GitHub, SourceForge, or BitBucket. This is because search engines have only a limited understanding of the code contained within such repositories. A second problem on the answering side is how to differentiate between the websites listed in the search results, and how to recognize the answer to your question when you see it.
It is not immediately obvious how to mitigate the problem on the asking side, but the problems on the answering side can be addressed by generating new web content. This new content, which we call the Research Software Directory, should describe software packages using generic language as much as possible, and should answer questions that researchers may have, such as "What can this tool do for me?", "Are other people in my field using it and what are they using it for?", and "Where do I go to get started?". Furthermore, software packages should be presented in their scientific context, by linking it to authors, publications, other software tools, blog posts, or whatever other content exists that may be relevant to the software package being presented. The Research Software Directory will accomplish two things: first, it helps researchers to quickly judge if a software package is relevant to their particular problem. Second, it will help search engines understand what a given software package is about, thereby improving the chances of earning a prominent place among the search results.
As a fortunate side-effect of presenting each tool in its scientific context, the Research Software Directory can be used to quickly gain a qualitative understanding of a tool's impact in the broadest sense of the word. This is important both for funders and for developers. Funders want to make sure that resources are granted such that maximum impact can be achieved, while developers benefit from being able to show that their software actually gets used as an integral part of scientific output.
Other scientific institutions could benefit from having their own Research Software Directory, but usually lack the resources required to develop such a platform. Therefore, we made our complete software stack available to others, free of charge. Visit https://github.com/research-software-directory/research-software-directory/ to get started on setting up your own!